Evidence Exhibition
KLT and Reper(R,I,U;D)
FORMAL CORERepresent a claim, object or event through a typed R/I/U reper with an explicit ground D and admissible domain Dom.
Details
Claimed novelty
Claimed authorial novelty: packet-reper organization of knowledge with D/Dom/ABSTAIN evidence discipline.
Mathematics
Reper(R,I,U;D), typed Dom, λ-profile, graph relations, and a ban on silent status promotion.
Implementation
Used as a methodological core of KLT-RBDv6 and KLT-RBD/RPD.
Evidence
Formal authorial system; prior-art analysis and external scientific assessment remain separate tasks.
Sources
NAPG / FOS
FORMAL GEOMETRYBuild a non-associative packet reper geometry and projective-harmonic language for complex connectivity.
Details
Claimed novelty
Claimed novelty: NAPG as a geometric dual contour to the packet reper algebraic line.
Mathematics
Projective configurations, associator constraints, FOS/SIGMA, and packet transformations.
Implementation
Presented in Volume II / geometry publications and the NAPG route archive.
Evidence
Formal geometry branch; external novelty assessment is not replaced by the exhibition layer.
Sources
Non-associative packet algebra R⋆R
OPEN PROOF OBLIGATIONSRelate packet multiplication, associators and structural coordinates to the reper-geometric architecture.
Details
Claimed novelty
Claimed authorial line: duality between non-associative packet algebra and NAPG.
Mathematics
Carrier, ⋆ operation, associator K, norms, structure constants and invariance require explicit specification.
Implementation
Computational and theorem-oriented studies exist; some proof obligations remain open.
Evidence
Research-level formal object; not labeled as a fully closed theory.
Sources
Desargues–Kurpishev theorem
THEOREM PACKAGEConnect the classical Desargues projective configuration with an authorial reper-packet interpretation.
Details
Claimed novelty
Claimed novelty concerns the authorial formulation, extension and interpretation; prior-art comparison is separate.
Mathematics
Projective incidences, harmonic relations and reper correspondences.
Implementation
Separate PDF/TeX and multilingual materials are published.
Evidence
Formal theorem contour; the exhibition does not claim external recognition of novelty.
Sources
PN.2
MATH + OPEN PHYSICSSeparate the strict mathematical package from physical interpretations of the PN.2 uncertainty principle.
Details
Claimed novelty
Claimed authorial math/physics line; physical status is not promoted without independent validation.
Mathematics
Theorem package, proof obligations, associator/structural coordinates and computational certificates.
Implementation
Canonical, journal and verification documents exist; some proof obligations are closed and others remain open.
Evidence
Physical hypotheses and EXT-RUN remain open; mathematical work does not imply empirical confirmation.
Sources
V*P Physics and Stratified Time
RESEARCH PROGRAMInterpret physical and cosmological processes through packet geometry and a stratified temporal structure.
Details
Claimed novelty
Claimed authorial physics/cosmology architecture; not presented as an established physical theory.
Mathematics
Projective-packet structures, associator geometry and temporal formalization.
Implementation
Volume III corpus, thematic papers and the physics route archive.
Evidence
RESEARCH PROGRAM; independent empirical confirmation is not claimed.
Sources
KLT-RBD / RPD / PredRep
COMPUTATIONAL CORETurn reper analysis into machine memory, an evidence graph and a typed predictive contour.
Details
Claimed novelty
Claimed novelty: a reper database as evidence-traceable computational architecture rather than a mere record collection.
Mathematics
RBD graph, typed transitions, D/Dom, λ-profiles, CGI, PredRep and ABSTAIN.
Implementation
KLT-RBDv6 Analyzer, SQLite/JSON/graph layers and the online/offline plan.
Evidence
Software implementation is demonstrable; scientific predictive validity requires domain tests.
Sources
KLT-RBD-CHEM / Evidence-D
PROTOTYPE + OPEN TESTSTransfer the reper evidence model to chemistry: object, source, Dom, units, uncertainty and linked Evidence-D.
Details
Claimed novelty
Claimed novelty: a chemical reper graph and DHCchem as a testable hypothesis inside an evidence-first contour.
Mathematics
C@Cchem → Repchem → Evidence-D → Ωλ → λ-profile → matched-null → blind test.
Implementation
Chemistry corpus v95–v116, KLT-RBD-CHEM, projective periodic table and software prototypes.
Evidence
DHCchem=OPEN-NOT-CONFIRMED; blind/EXT-RUN is not replaced by internal computation.
Sources
KLT-MATDES
LIVE ENGINEERING PROTOTYPESolve an inverse materials-design task: target properties → candidate compound → constraints → synthesis route.
Details
Claimed novelty
Claimed authorial novelty: applying KLT-RBD reper databases to explainable inverse material design.
Mathematics
Property objective, Dom/D constraints, substance/reaction graph, ranking and evidence trace.
Implementation
Live web polygon and project document; first contour: inorganic functional materials.
Evidence
Engineering prototype; external chemistry/materials validation remains a separate stage.
Sources
KLT-RBDv6 Analyzer
LIVE ENGINEERING PROTOTYPEAutomatically detect repers, vague grounds, gaps and falsifiable refinement candidates in texts.
Details
Claimed novelty
Claimed novelty: translating KLT-RBD into an applied text analyzer with an evidence-trace graph.
Mathematics
R/I/U/D extraction, D/Dom checks, graph edges, gap detection, scoring and ABSTAIN.
Implementation
Live web polygon; an offline Flutter/APK contour is planned in the unified program.
Evidence
Implemented software; domain-level conclusion quality depends on sources, schema and validation.
Sources
Anthropology of Cognition and “What Is Truth?”
PHILOSOPHICAL CORPUSRelate the formal notion of ground to historical types of perception, logic, ontology and the question of truth.
Details
Claimed novelty
Claimed authorial philosophical line: the Reper turn and P-01…P-04 / P-1…P-4 typology as a framework for anthropology of cognition.
Mathematics
Mathematics acts here as a methodological scaffold; the philosophical argument is not reduced to a computational theorem.
Implementation
Volume IV, philosophical papers and the ongoing Volume VII.
Evidence
Philosophical corpus and authorial interpretation; status differs from mathematical proof and empirical testing.